SB 268 · 2026 · Senate · Judiciary Committee
Biological sex classification standards
AI-generatedpermitting classification of individuals based on biological sex under certain limited circumstances.
Defines 'biological sex' and specifies that certain designations based on biological sex do not constitute unlawful discrimination.AI-generated
Status
Vetoed by the governor — the override vote has not been held yet · February 17, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓Senate
- ✓House
- Governor
- Law
Governor's veto message
“I vetoed a nearly identical bill to this one last year. I made it clear this issue needed to be addressed in a thoughtful, narrow way that protects the privacy, safety, and rights of all Granite Staters. Unfortunately, there is minimal difference between Senate Bill 268 and the bill I vetoed last year, which Governor Sununu vetoed the year prior.”
A passage from the Governor's veto message, quoted verbatim. The full message enters the record on veto day.
Analysis
This bill permits classification of individuals based on biological sex in lavatory facilities and locker rooms, sporting competitions, and detention facilities.
From the bill's official ANALYSIS section.
In the bill's words
Quoted verbatim from the bill as passed by both chambers.
“there are certain limited circumstances in which classification of persons based on biological sex is proper because such classification serves the compelling state interests of protecting the privacy rights and physical safety of such persons and others.”
This legislative finding states the rationale for the bill: that sex-based classification advances privacy and safety interests in specified settings.AI-generated
“Nothing in RSA 5-C:87, RSA 260-263, RSA 354-A, or any other law or regulation shall mean that it is unlawful discrimination based on sex or gender identity for any person or organization, public or private, to classify based on biological sex with respect to the following matters:”
This operative clause declares that sex-based classification in listed contexts does not constitute unlawful discrimination under state anti-discrimination law.AI-generated
“In athletic or sporting events or competitions in a sport or similar activity in which physical strength, speed, or endurance is generally recognized to give an advantage to biological males.”
The bill designates athletic competition as one of three settings where classifying by biological sex is expressly permitted.AI-generated
““Biological sex” shall mean the male and female biological sexes. This section does not mean that any public or private entity is required by state statute to separate persons based upon biological sex.”
The bill defines the key term while clarifying it permits, but does not mandate, sex-based separation.AI-generated
Official record
gc.nh.gov · the authoritative source
Sponsors
- Sen. Timothy LangRMajority Whip
Public testimony
No one submitted online testimony on this bill. See the record
Hearings and debates
- Feb 13, 2025Public hearingSenate Judiciary15:54–4:12:473h 56m 53s
- Mar 27, 2025Floor debateSenate floor13:09–1:09:3556m 26s
- Apr 16, 2025Public hearingHouse Judiciary1:19:45–4:31:583h 12m 13s
- Apr 23, 2025Executive sessionHouse Judiciary22:46–54:1531m 29s
- Sep 10, 2025Full committee work sessionHouse Judiciary1:11:43–1:14:533m 10s
- Nov 12, 2025Executive sessionHouse Judiciary2:08:50–2:32:2723m 37s
- Jan 8, 2026Floor debateHouse floor3:22:59–3:37:3014m 31s
Timestamps locate where this bill is taken up in the chamber's YouTube stream.
Votes
yeanay- Overall60% yea
- Resulting text: Bill as amended by the SenateOverall67% yea
- Nov 12, 2025HouseCommittee report· regular calendar: Ought to Pass10–7Overall59% yea
- Overall54% yeaParty-line voteRepublicans184–299% yeaDemocrats1–1561% yeaOther0–10% yea
Legislative history
- Jan 9, 2025SenIntroduced 01/09/2025 and Referred to Judiciary; SJ 3
- Feb 13, 2025SenHearing: 02/13/2025, Room 100, SH, 02:30 pm; SC 9A
- Mar 27, 2025SenCommittee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2025-1118s, 03/27/2025, Vote 3-2; SC 14
- Mar 27, 2025SenSpecial Order to the Beginning of the Regular Calendar, Without Objection; 03/27/2025; SJ 9
- Mar 27, 2025SenCommittee Amendment # 2025-1118s, AA, VV; 03/27/2025; SJ 9
- Mar 27, 2025SenWithout Objection, Sen. Birdsell Moved the Question; 03/27/2025; SJ 9
- Mar 27, 2025SenOught to Pass with Amendment #2025-1118s, RC 16Y-8N, MA; OT3rdg; 03/27/2025; SJ 9
- Mar 27, 2025HouseIntroduced (in recess of) 03/27/2025 and referred to Judiciary HJ 11 P. 113
- Apr 16, 2025HousePublic Hearing: 04/16/2025 10:30 am LOB 206-208
- Apr 23, 2025HouseExecutive Session: 04/23/2025 10:00 am LOB 206-208
- Apr 24, 2025HouseRetained in Committee
- Sep 10, 2025HouseFull Committee Work Session: 09/10/2025 10:00 am GP 230
- Nov 12, 2025HouseExecutive Session: 11/12/2025 10:00 am GP 230
- Nov 12, 2025HouseMajority : Ought to Pass 11/12/2025 (Vote 10-7; RC) HC 51 P. 40
- Nov 19, 2025HouseMinority : Inexpedient to Legislate
- Jan 8, 2026HouseOught to Pass: MA RC 185-159 01/08/2026 HJ 2 P. 49
- Jan 8, 2026HouseEnrolled (in recess of) 01/08/2026 HJ 3
- Jan 7, 2026SenEnrolled Adopted, VV, (In recess 01/07/2026); SJ 2
- Feb 6, 2026SenVetoed by Governor 02/06/2026
Coverage
- New Hampshire's 'bathroom bill' vetoed for the third timeNHPR · Feb 9, 2026
Ayotte vetoed SB 268, which would have amended the state's antidiscrimination law to allow classification of individuals based on biological sex in certain circumstances.AI-generated
- New Hampshire's 'bathroom bill' vetoed for the third timeNew Hampshire Bulletin
The brief reports Ayotte's veto of SB 268, which sought to define biological sex and permit sex-based classifications without them constituting unlawful discrimination.AI-generated
Background reading
Evergreen reading on the policy area — spanning perspectives — not coverage of this specific bill.
PolitiFact — Nonpartisan fact-checking outlet's state-by-state rundown of laws restricting transgender access to bathrooms and other sex-segregated facilities.AI-generated
- Transgender athlete laws by state: Legislation, science, moreNational context
ESPN — Overview of the state sports-eligibility laws sweeping the country, with the scientific and legal debates behind them.AI-generated
Office of U.S. Senator Mike Lee — Compilation of arguments from sponsors and advocates making the fairness-and-privacy case for defining sports eligibility by biological sex.AI-generated
American Civil Liberties Union — Civil-liberties group's account of the Title IX and Equal Protection challenges to sports bans and their effect on transgender students.AI-generated
Pew Research Center — National survey data on shifting public attitudes toward transgender sports and bathroom policies.AI-generated
- SB 268 (2025)NH context
Citizens Count — Nonpartisan New Hampshire civic guide's summary of the bill creating sex-based exceptions for facilities, sports, and treatment centers.AI-generated
Documents (PDF)
- Introducedversion
- As Amended by the Senateversion
- Adopted by both chambersversion
- Chaptered (final law)version
- Amendment 2025-1118samendment
- Governor's veto statementveto
Bill text & amendments link direct to gc.nh.gov; committee reports stream from the state record.