Citizen in a RepublicNH Bill Briefing
← All bills

HB 1788 · 2026 · House · Executive Departments and Administration Committee

Ban on DEI provisions in contracts

AI-generated

(New Title) holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

Requires courts to find that state contracts containing DEI-related provisions are void as a matter of law and establishes a right of action allowing citizens to sue public entities or state agencies over such contracts.AI-generated

Status

Referred to interim study (Senate) · April 10, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law

Analysis

This bill: I. Requires courts to find that contracts that include DEI-related provisions are void as a matter of law. II. Allows taxpayers to sue public entities or state agencies for engaging in, or failing to investigate allegations of, contracts with DEI-related provisions.

From the bill's official ANALYSIS section.

Official record

gc.nh.gov · the authoritative source

Sponsors

Rep. Rich NalevankoRPrime
  • Rep. Robert WherryRChair· Special Committee on COVID Response Efficacy
  • Rep. Joe SweeneyRDeputy Majority Leader
  • Rep. Ross BerryRChair· Election Law
  • Sen. Ruth WardRDeputy Majority Leader

Also: Rep. Susan DeRoyR, Rep. Jose CambrilsR

Public testimony

163 signed in online · 24 wrote testimony

2% support98% oppose0% neutral

In their wordsVerbatim, exactly as submitted

I oppose HB1788 because this sounds like another lawsuit. Remember, the anti-DEI legislation is a matter in which the State is already defending in court and likely to loose on the taxpayer’s dime. NH can’t treat everyone the same because people aren’t the same.
Mary Hakken-Phillips, Hanoveropposes
My name is Ehrin. I am a middle school educator in Concord, and I am also a resident of New Boston.
Ehrin Kelly, New Bostonopposes
We need to stop being afraid of diversity equity and inclusion. I strongly oppose this bill because I am not afraid of DEI.
Michelle Moge, Derryopposes

Verbatim excerpts of submitted testimony, quoted from the testimony tool.

Read the testimony · as of Aug 12, 2026

Hearings

  • 2026-01-1510:00 amHouse Executive Departments and AdministrationGP 231Public hearingrescheduled
  • 2026-03-031:00 pmHouse Executive Departments and AdministrationGP 159Public hearing
  • 2026-04-021:00 pmSenate JudiciarySH 100Public hearing

Legislative history

  1. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Executive Departments and Administration HJ 1 P. 36
  2. Jan 15, 2026HousePublic Hearing: 01/15/2026 10:00 am GP 231
  3. Mar 3, 2026HouseExecutive Session: 03/03/2026 01:00 pm GP 159
  4. Mar 3, 2026HouseMajority : Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0453h (NT) 03/03/2026 (Vote 9-7; RC) HC 10 P. 45
  5. Mar 4, 2026HouseMinority : Inexpedient to Legislate
  6. Mar 11, 2026HouseAmendment # 2026-0453h: AA DV 324-1 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 170
  7. Mar 11, 2026HouseOught to Pass with Amendment 2026-0453h: MA DV 179-148 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 171
  8. Mar 12, 2026SenIntroduced 03/12/2026 and Referred to Judiciary; SJ 7
  9. Apr 2, 2026SenHearing: 04/02/2026, Room 100, SH, 01:40 pm; SC 12
  10. Apr 16, 2026SenCommittee Report: Referred to Interim Study, 04/16/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 14
  11. Apr 16, 2026SenRefer to Interim Study, MA, VV; 04/16/2026; SJ 9

Coverage

No reporting linked yet.

Documents (PDF)

Bill text & amendments link direct to gc.nh.gov; committee reports stream from the state record.