HB 1292 · 2026 · House · Judiciary Committee
Right to try expansion for stem cells
AI-generatedexpanding the right to try act to include certain qualifying severe illness and permitting certain regenerative stem cell therapies under the act.
Extends the right to try act to patients with a qualifying severe illness, permits access to certain unapproved treatments, regulates regenerative stem cell therapies including consent and disclosure requirements, and authorizes injunctive relief for violations.AI-generated
Status
Referred to interim study (House) · March 5, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Analysis
This bill: I. Extends the right to try act to include patients with "qualifying severe illness" and defines related terms. II. Removes the definition of "investigational drug, biologic, or device." III. Permits access to unapproved treatments under specified conditions and adds a new section regulating regenerative stem cell therapies, including consent, accreditation, advertising, and disclosure requirements. IV. Authorizes injunctive relief for violations and prohibits the use of stem cells derived from a fetus or embryo after an abortion.
From the bill's official ANALYSIS section.
Official record
gc.nh.gov · the authoritative source
Sponsors
- Rep. Dan McGuireRVice Chair· Finance
- Rep. Sayra DeVitoRClerk· Fish and Game and Marine Resources
- Sen. Keith MurphyRDeputy President Pro Tempore
- Sen. Victoria SullivanRVice Chair· Education
Also: Rep. Daniel Popovici-MullerR, Rep. Matt Sabourin dit ChoinièreR, Rep. Mary MurphyR, Rep. Yury PolozovR, Rep. Cyril AuresR
Public testimony
154 signed in online · 37 wrote testimony
95% support5% oppose0% neutral
In their wordsVerbatim, exactly as submitted
“I would ask that you please support this bill. Using aborted baby parts is just horrible, killing babies is horrible! Thank you,”
“I oppose the use of aborted baby parts for any reason whatsoever. Our own stem cells can be harvested to successfully treat our health conditions. I respectfully ask that you support HB 1292.”
“My wife and I wholeheartedly support this bill. It will help ensure that abortion is not incentivized through harvesting aborted babies' body parts. May we keep sacred those who would have grown up in our world.…”
“NHMS is speaking in opposition to HB1292 •We have concerns about administering drugs that have not been through a thorough testing and approval process. This bill removes requirements that a drug has completed phase one of a clinical trial.…”
“I really wish people like Erica would stop trying to criminalized healthcare, this is a step backwards, not a step forward for New Hampshire. Everything Florida does should be a warning to us. We shouldn’t be trying to emulate them.…”
Verbatim excerpts of submitted testimony, quoted from the testimony tool.
Read the testimony · as of Aug 12, 2026
Hearings
- 2026-02-1110:00 amHouse JudiciaryGP 230Public hearing
- 2026-02-1310:00 amHouse JudiciaryGP 158Public hearing
Legislative history
- Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Judiciary HJ 1 P. 14
- Feb 11, 2026HousePublic Hearing: 02/11/2026 01:00 pm GP 230
- Feb 13, 2026HouseExecutive Session: 02/13/2026 10:00 am GP 158
- Feb 13, 2026HouseCommittee Report: Refer for Interim Study 02/13/2026 (Vote 17-1; CC) HC 9 P. 18
- Mar 5, 2026HouseRefer for Interim Study: MA VV 03/05/2026 HJ 6 P. 24
Coverage
No reporting linked yet.
Documents (PDF)
Bill text & amendments link direct to gc.nh.gov; committee reports stream from the state record.