Citizen in a RepublicNH Bill Briefing
← All bills

HB 1812 · 2026 · House · Commerce and Consumer Affairs Committee

Mental health insurance network reviews

AI-generated

requiring periodic evaluation of mental health access adequacy by an independent third party.

Establishes additional criteria for evaluating insurer network adequacy for primary and mental and behavioral health care, including periodic third-party evaluation, and creates administrative penalties and a private right of action for violations.AI-generated

Status

Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 19, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law

Analysis

This bill establishes additional criteria for assessment of an insurer's network adequacy for primary health care and mental and behavioral health care, including periodic evaluation of mental health access adequacy by a third party. The bill also establishes administrative penalties and a private right of action for violation of the requirements.

From the bill's official ANALYSIS section.

Official record

gc.nh.gov · the authoritative source

Sponsors

Rep. Alicia GreggDPrime
  • Rep. Jodi NelsonRClerk· Children and Family Law
  • Rep. Kimberly RiceRVice Chair· Children and Family Law

Also: Rep. Efstathia BoorasD, Sen. Donovan FentonD

Public testimony

26 signed in online · 5 wrote testimony

96% support4% oppose0% neutral

In their wordsVerbatim, exactly as submitted

AS a retired physician and member of the House Health and Human Services and Elderly Affairs Committee and legislative appointee to the New Hampshire Commission on Aging, I support HB 1812 as a means of monitoring the availability of adequate provider networks in New Hampshire.
Janet Lucas, Camptonsupports
I believe a system of periodically instructing teachers and public school staff on how to identify and seek help for a student or colleague at risk for suicide is a process worth investing in. Francis Hayes, MD ret.
Francis Hayes, Canterburysupports
As someone who has been a mental health counselor in New Hampshire for more than 15 years, I absolutely support this bill.
Stephanie Vazzano, Concordsupports
The supposed "network adequacy criteria" is nothing more than a short list of measurement types (no quantification or required achievement) to fill in a report. Useless.
Daniel Richardson, Nashuaopposes

Verbatim excerpts of submitted testimony, quoted from the testimony tool.

Read the testimony · as of Aug 12, 2026

Hearings

  • 2026-01-2110:00 amHouse Commerce and Consumer AffairsGP 229Public hearing
  • 2026-01-221:15 pmHouse Commerce and Consumer AffairsGP 229Public hearing
  • 2026-02-041:00 pmHouse Commerce and Consumer AffairsGP 229Public hearing

Legislative history

  1. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Commerce and Consumer Affairs HJ 1 P. 37
  2. Jan 21, 2026HousePublic Hearing: 01/21/2026 10:45 am GP 229
  3. Jan 22, 2026HouseSubcommittee Work Session: 01/22/2026 02:15 pm GP 229
  4. Feb 4, 2026HouseExecutive Session: 02/04/2026 01:00 pm GP 229
  5. Feb 4, 2026House: Inexpedient to Legislate 02/04/2026 (Vote 16-0; CC) HC 7 P. 6
  6. Feb 19, 2026HouseInexpedient to Legislate: MA VV 02/19/2026 HJ 5 P. 8

Coverage

No reporting linked yet.

Documents (PDF)

Bill text & amendments link direct to gc.nh.gov; committee reports stream from the state record.