Citizen in a RepublicNH Bill Briefing
← All bills

HB 1643 · 2026 · House · Children and Family Law Committee

Limiting guardian ad litem reports

AI-generated

relative to the report of a guardian ad litem.

Removes the court's authority to request that a guardian ad litem's report propose an allocation of decision-making responsibility, a parenting plan, or a specific parenting schedule.AI-generated

Status

Vetoed by the governor — the override vote has not been held yet · June 22, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law

Governor's veto message

The role of the guardian ad litem is to assist the court in determining the best interests of the child. To that end, under current law guardians ad litem are directed by the court to gather information and, only if specifically requested by the court, make certain recommendations relating to parenting plans, schedules, and decision-making responsibilities. Ultimately, the court is responsible for making determinations relative to a child's welfare. This bill would strip the authority of the court to request a guardian ad litem provide recommendations for consideration by the judge and limits information available to the court, which could impede its ability to ensure the best interests of a child.
Gov. Kelly Ayotte · Jun 12, 2026 · excerpt

A passage from the Governor's veto message, quoted verbatim. The full message enters the record on veto day.

Analysis

This bill removes the authority of the court to request that the guardian ad litem's report propose an allocation of decision-making responsibility; a parenting plan; or a specific parenting schedule.

From the bill's official ANALYSIS section.

In the bill's words

Quoted verbatim from the bill as passed by both chambers.

The guardian ad litem shall file a report of his or her investigation no later than the date of the final pretrial hearing.
RSA 461-A:16, I-c

Sets the deadline by which the guardian ad litem must submit an investigative report in a parenting case.AI-generated

The report shall not propose any of the following [unless specifically requested by the court]:
RSA 461-A:16, I-c

The bracketed clause is the language struck from current law, removing the court's ability to request certain recommendations.AI-generated

(a) An allocation of decision-making responsibility; (b) A parenting plan; or (c) A specific parenting schedule.
RSA 461-A:16, I-c

Lists the three recommendations the guardian ad litem's report may no longer propose.AI-generated

This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Section 2

Establishes when the change to guardian ad litem reports takes effect.AI-generated

Official record

gc.nh.gov · the authoritative source

Sponsors

Rep. Kimberly RiceRPrimeVice Chair· Children and Family Law
  • Rep. Kristin NobleRChair· Education Policy and Administration
  • Rep. Jeanine NotterRAssistant Majority Leader
  • Rep. Sherman PackardRSpeaker of the House
  • Rep. Jason OsborneRMajority Leader
  • Rep. Jodi NelsonRClerk· Children and Family Law
  • Rep. Debra DeSimoneRChair· Children and Family Law
  • Sen. Daryl AbbasRChair· Children and Family Law
  • Sen. Victoria SullivanRVice Chair· Children and Family Law

Also: Rep. Jim KofaltR

Public testimony

12 signed in online · 2 wrote testimony

50% support50% oppose0% neutral

AgainstChildren need representation in cases affecting them

AI-generatedLeading arguments, summarized by the testimony tool.

Read the arguments

In their wordsVerbatim, exactly as submitted

It’s important that children have representation in cases that affect their lives.
Margaret Konze, Pembrokeopposes
This bill has clear, substantive implications for child safety and judicial decision-making. It is not a technical cleanup — it meaningfully reduces the court’s access to expert guidance
Hannah Meiselman, Manchesteropposes

Verbatim excerpts of submitted testimony, quoted from the testimony tool.

Read the testimony · as of Aug 12, 2026

Hearings and debates

  • Feb 17, 2026Public hearingHouse Children and Family Law3:36:01–4:05:5029m 49s
  • Mar 3, 2026Executive sessionHouse Children and Family Law32:48–1:08:4435m 56s
  • Mar 11, 2026Floor debateHouse floor54:12–58:053m 53sTimestamp located by Whisper transcription (this session video has no YouTube captions).
  • Apr 2, 2026Public hearingSenate Children and Family Law11:30–21:3010m
  • Apr 23, 2026Floor debateSenate floor1:28:18–1:34:155m 57s

Timestamps locate where this bill is taken up in the chamber's YouTube stream.

Votes

yeanay
Starting text: Bill as introduced
  • Mar 3, 2026HouseCommittee report· regular calendar: Ought to Pass97
    Overall
    56% yea
  • Mar 11, 2026HouseDivisionOught to PassAdopted182149
    Overall
    55% yea
  • Apr 23, 2026SenateCommittee report: Ought to Pass21
    Overall
    67% yea
  • Apr 23, 2026SenateVoice voteOught to Passadopted

Legislative history

  1. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Children and Family Law HJ 1 P. 29
  2. Feb 17, 2026HousePublic Hearing: 02/17/2026 01:30 pm GP 230
  3. Mar 2, 2026House==RESCHEDULED== Executive Session: 03/02/2026 10:00 am GP 230
  4. Mar 3, 2026HouseExecutive Session: 03/03/2026 10:00 am GP 230
  5. Mar 3, 2026HouseMajority : Ought to Pass 03/03/2026 (Vote 9-7; RC) HC 10 P. 30
  6. Mar 4, 2026HouseMinority : Refer for Interim Study
  7. Mar 11, 2026HouseOught to Pass: MA DV 182-149 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 66
  8. Mar 12, 2026SenIntroduced 03/12/2026 and Referred to Children and Family Law; SJ 7
  9. Apr 2, 2026SenHearing: 04/02/2026, Room 100, SH, 09:40 am; SC 12
  10. Apr 23, 2026Sen: Ought to Pass, 04/23/2026; Vote 2-1; CC; SC 15A
  11. Apr 23, 2026SenHB 1643 was Removed from the Consent Calendar; 04/23/2026; SJ 10
  12. Apr 23, 2026SenOught to Pass: MA, VV; OT3rdg; 04/23/2026; SJ 10
  13. May 21, 2026SenEnrolled Adopted, VV, (In recess 05/21/2026); SJ 14
  14. May 21, 2026HouseEnrolled (in recess of) 05/21/2026 HJ 14 P. 34
  15. Jun 12, 2026HouseVetoed by Governor Ayotte 06/12/2026

Coverage

  • HB 1643 (2026) | NH Legislation | Citizens CountCitizens Count

    The bill would have removed the court's ability to require a guardian ad litem to propose an allocation of decision-making responsibility, a parenting plan, or a specific parenting schedule.AI-generated

Background reading

Evergreen reading on the policy area — spanning perspectives — not coverage of this specific bill.

Documents (PDF)

Bill text & amendments link direct to gc.nh.gov; committee reports stream from the state record.