HB 1547 · 2026 · House · Judiciary Committee
Circuit court appeal election rules
AI-generatedrelative to appeals from convictions in circuit court for certain offenses.
Requires defendants charged with certain offenses to elect between proceeding in circuit court with a jury trial waiver or immediately appealing to superior court for a jury trial.AI-generated
Status
Referred to interim study (House) · February 12, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Analysis
This bill requires a defendant charged with certain offenses to elect whether to proceed in circuit court and waive his or her right to a jury trial or to immediately appeal to superior court for a jury trial.
From the bill's official ANALYSIS section.
In the bill's words
Quoted verbatim from the bill as introduced. Passages chosen from the operative text.Computed by this site
“In any prosecution for a violation of RSA 632-A:4 [involving a victim less than 18 years of age at the time the prosecution is commenced, and] which is brought in the circuit court, the defendant may elect to either:”
“In any prosecution for a violation of RSA 631:2-a or 631:2-b, which is charged as a class A misdemeanor in the circuit court, the defendant may elect to either:”
“Appeals. – Except as provided in RSA 631:2-c, 632-A:9-a, and 633:3-a, IX a person convicted by a circuit court of a class A misdemeanor, at the time the sentence is declared, may appeal therefrom to obtain a de novo jury trial in the superior court, which shall hear the appeal.”
“A circuit court shall not proceed with a trial under subparagraph I(b) unless it has conducted a colloquy with the defendant and finds that the defendant has knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his or her right to a jury trial.”
Official record
gc.nh.gov · the authoritative source
Sponsors
- Rep. Claudine BurnhamRDeputy Majority Whip
- Rep. Katelyn KuttabRClerk· Judiciary
- Rep. Marie Louise BjelobrkRClerk· Municipal and County Government
- Sen. Victoria SullivanRVice Chair· Education
Also: Rep. Kelley PotenzaR, Rep. Alicia GreggD, Rep. Loren SeligD, Rep. Matt Sabourin dit ChoinièreR, Rep. Zoe ManosD
Public testimony
7 signed in online · 2 wrote testimony
29% support71% oppose0% neutral
In their wordsVerbatim, exactly as submitted
“I oppose this bill because it reduces transparency or public accountability and does not meaningfully improve outcomes for New Hampshire residents.”
Verbatim excerpts of submitted testimony, quoted from the testimony tool.
Read the testimony · as of Aug 12, 2026
Votes
yeanay- Jan 28, 2026HouseCommittee report· consent calendar: Refer for Interim Study18–0Overall100% yea
- Feb 12, 2026HouseVoice voteRefer for Interim Studyadopted
Hearings and debates
- Jan 28, 2026Public hearingHouse Judiciary1:57:25–2:15:4018m 15slocated in the stream transcriptCommittee Report: Refer for Interim Study; Public Hearing; Executive Session
- Feb 12, 2026Floor debateHouse floorWatchnot located in the transcript — opens the full streamRefer for Interim Study — adopted, voice vote
Timestamps locate where this bill is taken up in the chamber's YouTube stream.
Legislative history
- Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Judiciary HJ 1 P. 25
- Jan 28, 2026HousePublic Hearing: 01/28/2026 11:30 am GP 230
- Jan 28, 2026HouseExecutive Session: 01/28/2026 11:30 am GP 230
- Jan 28, 2026HouseCommittee Report: Refer for Interim Study 01/28/2026 (Vote 18-0; CC) HC 6 P. 7
- Feb 12, 2026HouseRefer for Interim Study: MA VV 02/12/2026 HJ 4 P. 8
Coverage
No reporting linked yet.
Documents (PDF)
Bill text & amendments link direct to gc.nh.gov; committee reports stream from the state record.