HB 1084 · 2026 · House · Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee
Surrendering guns under protective orders
AI-generatedrelative to the relinquishment of deadly weapons by those subject to a domestic violence protective order.
Requires defendants subject to domestic violence protective orders to immediately relinquish all deadly weapons, firearms, and ammunition they control, own, or possess, and mandates that courts issue search warrants when relinquishment is incomplete.AI-generated
Status
Committee recommended Inexpedient to Legislate; died at adjournment · February 24, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Analysis
This bill modifies the process for when a domestic violence order of protection is issued requiring the respondent to relinquish deadly weapons.
From the bill's official ANALYSIS section.
Official record
gc.nh.gov · the authoritative source
Sponsors
- Rep. Jennifer MandelbaumDClerk· State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs
- Sen. Rebecca Perkins KwokaDMinority Leader
Also: Rep. Alicia GreggD, Rep. Zoe ManosD, Rep. Jodi NewellD, Rep. Loren SeligD
Public testimony
342 signed in online · 169 wrote testimony
54% support46% oppose0% neutral
ForGeneral support: keep weapons from domestic abusers
AgainstConstitutional due-process and Second Amendment concerns
AI-generatedLeading arguments, summarized by the testimony tool.
Read the argumentsIn their wordsVerbatim, exactly as submitted
“On behalf of the Hilde B Foundation, an international nonprofit dedicated to ending domestic violence through education, technology, and policy advocacy, we write in strong support of HB1084. This bill addresses one of the most critical and evidence-based domestic violence safety measures: reducing access to deadly weapons for individuals subject to protective orders.…”
“I support the relinquishment of deadly weapons by those subject to a domestic violence protective order.”
“I think this is an important and necessary thing to do, I strongly support this bill.”
“Subject Honorable Committee Members, I want to take a moment to share how I am thinking about HB 1084, and why I am asking you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate.…”
“The sponsors clearly have no concept of the logistics of immediately releasing personal valuable property to an officer serving an order.”
“I oppose this bill because it reduces transparency, access, or fairness in public processes and does not meaningfully improve outcomes for New Hampshire residents.”
Verbatim excerpts of submitted testimony, quoted from the testimony tool.
Read the testimony · as of Aug 12, 2026
Hearings
- 2026-01-2810:00 amHouse Criminal Justice and Public SafetyGP 159Public hearing
Legislative history
- Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Criminal Justice and Public Safety HJ 1 P. 5
- Jan 28, 2026HousePublic Hearing: 01/28/2026 02:00 pm GP 159
- Feb 11, 2026HouseExecutive Session: 02/11/2026 02:00 pm GP 159
- Feb 11, 2026HouseMajority : Inexpedient to Legislate 02/11/2026 (Vote 7-6; RC) HC 10 P. 79
- Feb 24, 2026HouseMinority : Ought to Pass
Coverage
No reporting linked yet.
Documents (PDF)
Bill text & amendments link direct to gc.nh.gov; committee reports stream from the state record.