HB 422 · 2025 · House · Resources, Recreation and Development Committee
Higher fines for shoreland violations
AI-generatedincreasing penalties for violations of the shoreland and water quality protection act.
Raises the maximum civil penalty and administrative fine for violations of the shoreland and water quality protection act from $5,000 to $15,000 per offense.AI-generated
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 13, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Analysis
This bill increases penalties for violations of the shoreland and water quality protection act.
From the bill's official ANALYSIS section.
Official record
gc.nh.gov · the authoritative source
Sponsors
- Rep. John MacDonaldRVice Chair· Municipal and County Government
- Rep. Karen EbelDDemocratic Leader Pro Tempore
- Sen. Rebecca Perkins KwokaDMinority Leader
Also: Rep. Richard BrownR, Rep. Nancy MurphyD, Sen. David WattersD
Public testimony
175 signed in online · 92 wrote testimony
97% support3% oppose0% neutral
ForCurrent $5,000 fine is too low to deter violators, treated as a cost of doing business
AgainstIncreased penalties create financial burden and neighbor disputes
AI-generatedLeading arguments, summarized by the testimony tool.
Read the argumentsIn their wordsVerbatim, exactly as submitted
“As president of the Contoocook Lake Area Preservation Association (CLAPA), I am writing on behalf of our organization in support of this bill. CLAPA is a 150-member voluntary association dedicated to preserving and protecting the health and beauty of our lake.…”
“Our waterways deserve comprehensive protection and this bill does just that. Increasing the amount of fines levied per violation of the shoreland and water quality protection act is long overdue.…”
“The Shoreland Water Quality Protection Act established a protected shoreland area close to lakes, rivers, and streams. Within this area, vegetation removal, excavation, fill, fertilizer use, and development activities are regulated to safeguard waterbody health.…”
“More fees and fines if imposed will cause extreme financial burdens on those accused. We pay enough taxes with little or no return in services.”
“I urge you to oppose increasing violation penalties. There are many lake residents on fixed incomes with properties that have been in the family for decades and some for generations. Costs have increased dramatically in the recent past. Incomes have not.…”
Verbatim excerpts of submitted testimony, quoted from the testimony tool.
Read the testimony · as of Aug 12, 2026
Hearings
- 2025-01-2210:00 amHouse Resources, Recreation and DevelopmentLOB 305Public hearing
- 2025-01-2910:15 amHouse Resources, Recreation and DevelopmentLOB 305Public hearing
Legislative history
- Jan 9, 2025HouseIntroduced (in recess of) 01/09/2025 and referred to Resources, Recreation and Development HJ 3 P. 9
- Jan 22, 2025HousePublic Hearing: 01/22/2025 01:00 pm LOB 305
- Jan 29, 2025HouseExecutive Session: 01/29/2025 10:15 am LOB 305
- Jan 29, 2025HouseMajority : Inexpedient to Legislate 01/29/2025 (Vote 9-7; RC) HC 11 P. 12
- Feb 4, 2025HouseMinority : Ought to Pass
- Feb 13, 2025HouseInexpedient to Legislate: MA RC 196-175 02/13/2025 HJ 5 P. 30
Coverage
No reporting linked yet.
Documents (PDF)
Bill text & amendments link direct to gc.nh.gov; committee reports stream from the state record.